Daily BriefingSearch Archive
SN
Sanctuary News
← Back to News Feed
Jul 25, 2026

AI in Classrooms: Teaching vs. Soul Shepherding

Limited source confidence · editorial review queued

This article is published while queued for moderation. Read the linked reporting and distinguish attributed claims from independently established facts. How our editorial process works

Original reporting
68

Automated truthfulness assessment

Mixed or partially verified

The article is an opinion piece arguing moral and pastoral limits of AI in education. Its core normative claims are plausible but presented without empirical evidence, case examples, or citations. Several material assertions (especially about AI's educational capacities and social effects) are left unsubstantiated in the text and would benefit from independent research, stakeholder testimony, and technical detail.

This automated score estimates evidentiary support for factual claims. It does not establish absolute truth, intent, or publisher honesty. Version 1, assessed 7/25/2026.

News Summary

Reported facts: A Fox News opinion column by William Bennett and Jon Hage contends that AI can imitate teaching tasks but cannot 'shepherd a soul,' and calls for ethical guardrails and stronger character education when AI is used in classrooms. Attributed claims: The authors assert that AI lacks the capacity to provide moral and spiritual formation, and therefore should not replace human teachers in that role. Uncertainty: The piece presents opinion and moral argument rather than empirical studies; it does not cite specific research, case studies, or policy proposals that demonstrate either the effectiveness or harms of AI in moral formation.

Source and Framing Analysis

This is an opinion column, not investigative reporting. Its framing emphasizes moral and spiritual limitations of AI and assumes a pastoral model of education. The article asserts normative claims (what should or should not be) without supplying empirical evidence or specific examples; it foregrounds character and ethical concerns over technical descriptions or data about AI’s classroom effects.

Biblical Reflection

The authors' central ethical intuition — that machines cannot perform the pastoral, relational work of forming conscience — aligns with a long biblical tradition that values embodied relationships and pastoral care. Scripture portrays shepherding as a human calling that combines teaching, presence, accountability, and sacrificial care; AI may assist with information delivery but lacks the relational goods essential to discipleship. Christians should therefore resist simplistic substitutions of technology for the interpersonal ministries that shape hearts. At the same time, Christians must avoid technophobia and instead practice faithful discernment. Technology can relieve burdens, personalize instruction, and expand access; prudence requires distinguishing beneficial uses from dehumanizing ones. The call for ethical guardrails is compatible with Christian concern for justice, protection of the vulnerable, and stewardship of gifts. Churches and Christian educators should press for policies that protect children’s dignity, ensure transparency about AI use, and embed character formation intentionally in curricula. Finally, our response should blend humility and courage: humility to acknowledge legitimate benefits and limits of technology, and courage to advocate for structures (parental involvement, mentor relationships, and moral formation programs) that cannot be outsourced. Where AI increases efficiencies, it should free adults to do the costly, relational work of mentoring and shepherding students rather than become an excuse to abdicate it.

Scripture in context

  1. 1John 10:11-16 — In John 10, Jesus speaks of himself as the Good Shepherd who knows, leads, and lays down his life for the sheep; the language emphasizes personal knowledge, protection, and sacrificial care within the covenantal relationship between shepherd and flock. — This passage highlights the relational, protective, and sacrificial dimensions of pastoral leadership that technology cannot reproduce; Christians can use it to argue that moral formation requires embodied care, presence, and commitment.
  2. 2Proverbs 22:6 — Proverbs offers wisdom about training a child in ways that form habits and character over time, speaking to the long-term nature of moral instruction within family and community settings. — The proverb underscores that character formation is a sustained, relational practice; while AI might supplement instruction, the proverb supports investing adults and institutions in long-term moral guidance.

Faithful Response

Pray for discernment about how AI is used in your local schools and for wisdom for school boards and educators. Engage constructively: ask schools whether AI will be transparent, how student data is protected, and how character education will be preserved alongside new tools. Offer time and resources as a mentor, tutor, or volunteer so that relational formation remains central to schooling. Teach and model digital discernment with children—how to engage technology ethically, critically, and with humility.

Reflection and Discussion

  1. 1How does Scripture’s emphasis on embodied relationships shape our evaluation of technologies that mediate learning?
  2. 2Who in your community is being asked to do the hard work of character formation, and how might AI alter their role?
  3. 3What standards of love, justice, and truth should guide policy decisions about AI in schools?

Sources

Reporting links are evidence inputs; Sanctuary News' biblical reflection is commentary.

This outlook currently relies on fewer than two linked sources. Broaden verification before teaching from it.

  1. 1.WILLIAM BENNETT, JON HAGE: AI can mimic a teacher, but it cannot shepherd a soulprimary_reporting
Download source notes