May 28, 2026

Justice Department opens criminal inquiry into whether E. Jean Carroll committed perjury in lawsuits against Donald Trump

Limited source confidence · editorial review queued

This article is published while queued for moderation. Read the linked reporting and distinguish attributed claims from independently established facts. How our editorial process works

News Summary

The U.S. Department of Justice is conducting a criminal investigation into whether author E. Jean Carroll committed perjury in connection with her civil lawsuits against Donald Trump, according to sources. The inquiry is being led by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Illinois. The central question is whether Carroll lied in a 2022 deposition when she said she had received no outside funding for her litigation; subsequent filings showed that Reid Hoffman helped pay some of her legal expenses. Carroll sued Trump alleging a sexual assault in the mid-1990s and later defamation; juries found Trump liable in 2023 (sexual assault and defamation, $5 million awarded) and in 2024 (defamation, $83.3 million awarded). Both judgments were upheld on appeal. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit previously noted Carroll had “plausibly represented” she had forgotten about limited outside funding and observed she was not involved in who funded litigation costs. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, who previously represented Trump in some litigation, is recused. CBS News and CNN reported the investigation; DOJ and Carroll’s former attorney have been contacted for comment.

Biblical Reflection

This story sits at the intersection of truth-seeking and political conflict. A legitimate criminal inquiry into alleged perjury is part of the justice system’s work to protect the integrity of sworn testimony. At the same time, the case emerges from highly public, politically charged litigation with powerful actors on all sides. Christians should affirm the importance of truthful testimony and institutional integrity while resisting partisan rushes to judgment. The appeals court’s observation that Carroll may have simply forgotten limited funding reminds us that criminal perjury requires not only a false statement but wrongful intent. The involvement of a wealthy donor raises questions about how money shapes access to litigation and public narratives, but financial support alone is not proof of criminal conduct. Pastoral concern also requires care for survivors of sexual harm; allegations should not be dismissed lightly. Practically, the Christian posture is to pray for careful, impartial fact-finding; to stand for truth and accountability; and to guard against weaponizing legal processes for political ends.

Scripture in context

This outlook does not yet include contextual Scripture citations. Do not treat a general biblical theme as an exegetical conclusion.

Faithful Response

No prescribed response is offered. Consider the reflection prompts below in your own church context.

Reflection and Discussion

  1. 1Are we treating the reported investigation as proven fact or as an allegation that requires corroboration and proof of intent?
  2. 2How does the presence of wealthy donors in legal battles shape our instincts about fairness, and how should Christians weigh that when seeking justice?
  3. 3In polarized cases, how can we hold a posture that demands truth while offering care and dignity to all persons involved?

Sources

Reporting links are evidence inputs; Sanctuary News' biblical reflection is commentary.

This outlook currently relies on fewer than two linked sources. Broaden verification before teaching from it.

  1. 1.Original reportprimary
Download source notes